Search This Blog

Monday, July 15

Man Sues Apple For Letting Him Access Internet P0*N

Man Sues Apple For Letting Him Access Internet P0*N


Date Posted: 15/07/2013
A Tennessee man is suing Apple, claiming the tech giant is at fault for selling devices that grant him unrestricted access to P0*n on the internet.
In a 50 page complaint, filed mid-June, former attorney Chris Sevier holds that since Apple is “concerned with the welfare of our Nation’s children, while furthering pro-American values” it should “sell all its devices in ‘safe mode,’ with software preset to filter out P0*nographic content.”
Per the complaint, Sevier’s problem began after he tried to visit “Facebook.com,” but — accidentally, he says — typed “F**kbook.com,” an adult site that “appealed to his biological sensibilities as a male and led to an unwanted addiction with adverse consequences.”
From there, judging by the suit, things spiraled way out of control.
The complaint alleges “Apple is hijacking great s*x” by allowing customers to view p****graphy online, as well as being complicit in “the development of s*x trafficking … child prostitution,” and many other societal ills.
Later, in a section highlighted by Above the Law, Sevier accuses Apple of enabling”unfair competition” between P0*n actresses and his wife:
UNFAIR COMPETITION AND INTERFERENCE OF THE MARITAL CONTRACT: The Plaintiff became totally out of synch in his romantic relationship with his wife, which was a consequence of his use of his Apple product. The Plaintiff began desiring, younger more beautiful girls featured in P0*n videos than his wife, who was no longer 21 … The Plaintiff could no longer tell the difference between internet p****graphy and tangible intercourse due to the content he accessed through the Apple products.
Sevier also argues that Apple has hurt “brick and mortar or ‘mom and pop’ P0*n shops” that have suffered as a result of the ubiquity of free online p****graphy. According to Circa, Apple has yet to respond to the filing.
Sevier’s license to practice law was placed on “disability inactive status” in December of 2011.

No comments: